Free La Burgos: A trans black woman unjustly sentenced

We are calling on the Constitutional Court to review the tutela filed by Andrea Burgos, an Afro and trans woman sentenced to 10 years in prison without evidence in Buenaventura, Colombia.

The Colombian Pacific is a land of life, culture, and resistance—but also of exclusion, racism, and denial of rights. The case of Andrea Burgos, a Black trans woman and influencer from Buenaventura, reveals this reality. Her story reflects how the Colombian judicial system continues to fail to guarantee equality for all bodies.

Andrea was sentenced to nearly 10 years in prison without evidence, without real legal defense, and without ever being notified of the trial. Her case is not a mistake: it is a judicial false positive—a conviction without justice, masked by an appearance of legality. The State needed results and found in Andrea the perfect victim: racialized, poor, dissident, and without institutional support.

From the beginning, Andrea was targeted because of her gender identity. She was detained without a warrant and not in the act of committing a crime, violating her rights to liberty and due process. During her detention, she was humiliated, beaten, and verbally abused. She was accused of carrying a weapon that never appeared, and the transphobic violence she endured was not corrected—it was legitimized by the judicial system.

Key failures in the judicial process:

1) Arbitrary arrest and homophobic treatment: She was irregularly deprived of her liberty, searched without authorization, and assaulted because of her gender identity.

2) Violation of the right to a defense: Although there were ways to contact her, only one call was made and went unanswered. Neither the court nor the public defender followed up. The trial proceeded without her.

3) Disproportionate sentence: She was sentenced to 10 years without evidence, without a fair hearing, and without the right to appeal. One magistrate noted that the ruling was disproportionate and lacked minimum guarantees.

Andrea represents many who live at the intersection of poverty, gender, and racialization. Her case shows how the justice system swiftly excludes and punishes those it deems disposable. Her trial moved forward as if her existence didn’t matter.

This is not an isolated incident. In regions like the Pacific, the State does not bring justice—it brings punishment. Being trans, Black, poor, or dissident remains grounds for suspicion, criminalization, and conviction. Andrea wasn’t defended—she was discarded.

That is why this case is key for Colombia. It shows that if the State can convict someone without defense, without evidence, and without a hearing, it can do the same to anyone it deems unworthy of being heard.

This petition was created and is led by the Colectivo Justicia Racial.

0people have signed
Goal: 50,000

To the members of the Constitutional Court of Colombia

We, the undersigned, respectfully request that the Constitutional Court review the case of Andrea Burgos, a trans, Black, and impoverished woman from Buenaventura, who was sentenced without minimum legal guarantees. What Andrea experienced was not a mistake, but the expression of a system that punishes those living at the intersection of multiple vulnerabilities. Therefore, we respectfully request:

Review of the arbitrary arrest
Andrea was detained without a warrant and not in the act of committing a crime, violating her rights to liberty and due process. During her detention, she was humiliated and assaulted. We ask that the legality of her arrest be reviewed and that the actions of the police be investigated.


Guarantees for trans people
We request a review of the physical and verbal abuse she suffered at the hands of police officers due to her gender identity. Transphobic discrimination must be taken into account as an aggravating factor in the review of this case.

Violation of the right to a defense
Andrea was not notified of her trial and had no real access to legal defense. Despite multiple ways to contact her, only one call was made. Her public defender did not follow up, did not argue on her behalf, and did not appeal. The case proceeded without her presence or effective representation.

Review of the disproportionate sentence
Andrea was sentenced to 10 years in prison without material evidence against her. A magistrate pointed out the disproportion of the ruling. We request that it be reviewed in light of principles of justice and equity.

Application of a differential approach
We urge the Court to consider her condition as a trans, racialized, and impoverished woman. The analysis must take this intersection into account to ensure a fair and protective process.

Recognition of systemic criminalization
This case reflects a widespread practice: the criminalization of dissident bodies in contexts of poverty and racialization. We ask the Court to set a precedent to prevent future cases like Andrea’s.

Recognition of judicial false positives
Andrea was sentenced without evidence, without defense, and without a legitimate trial. Her case must be recognized as a judicial false positive—a conviction with an appearance of legality, but devoid of justice. We urge the Court to take action against these practices that undermine the rule of law.

When the system convicts without defense or notification, we are not facing technical failures but rather an institutional policy of punishment. If this happened to Andrea, it can happen to anyone the State chooses not to listen to.

Sincerely,


0people have signed
Goal: 50,000